tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5923978447493188869.post5152481546772840870..comments2023-10-12T02:58:35.548-05:00Comments on No Border Wall: Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club challenge the constitutionality of the Real ID ActNO BORDER WALLhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16705064894973061623noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5923978447493188869.post-80461529760259028542007-11-03T17:20:00.000-05:002007-11-03T17:20:00.000-05:00Bulldozing began again immidiately after Chertoff ...Bulldozing began again immidiately after Chertoff waived the laws, so it is too late to prevent that much of the destruction. I would hope that if the Supreme Court finds section 102 of the Real ID Act to be unconstitutional DHS will be forced to remove the sections of wall that violate the Endangered Species Act and all the rest. Then some sort of restoration could begin. When sections of the wall were found to have been built in Mexican territory those sections were removed. The greater benefit would be to the areas that are slated to get a wall, but where construction has not yet begun. The Lower Rio Grande National Wildlife Refuge is scheduled to get walls beginning next spring, despite the presence of federally endangered ocelots and jaguarundi, and its importance as a stopover for migrating birds.NO BORDER WALLhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16705064894973061623noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5923978447493188869.post-77007338849569134022007-11-03T12:58:00.000-05:002007-11-03T12:58:00.000-05:00This is very good news. I wonder if the results, ...This is very good news. I wonder if the results, if they are positive, can be implemented soon enough to stop any destruction of the BANWR and the San Pedro River.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com